A-DIGITAL-Eye

 

nik Sharpener & nik Sharpener Pro

Software Review

 

Samples & Conclusions

 

Resized from 2048 by 1536 to 300 by 200 at 72 dpi

Top Left is Not Sharpened - Top Right is Photoshop's Sharpen Filter

Below is Sharpened with nik Sharpener "John" profile

Bottom Left is Photoshop's Sharpen More filter - Bottom Right is Sharpen Edges filter

 


 

Top Left Not Sharpened - Top Right Photoshop's Sharpen Filter

Bottom nik Sharpener - John Profile

 


At 100% Original Image Size, Cropped only - 72dpi

Top Left = Not Sharpened - Middle = Sharpen Filter - Top Right = nik Sharpener

 


Cropped from 100% Image Size

None - Sharpen Filter - nik Sharpener

 


Cropped from 100% Image Size

None- Sharpen Filter - nik Sharpener


ORIGINAL NIKON COOLPIX 990 2048 by 1536 UNALTERED FILE

NIK SHARPENER FILE (Internet Anna Mode Saved at 100% Jpeg=2.5 meg file)


CONCLUSIONS

We have used nik Sharpener Pro for over 6 weeks now and have sharpened hundreds of pictures. It has produced consistent results which appear to have a better focus compared to either no sharpening or the "Sharpen" filter in Photoshop. When we used the "Sharpen More" filter in Photoshop, areas of the picture with more details appeared to be over sharpened. In other words, we preferred the nik Sharpener result almost every time. While nik Sharpener standard edition works fine, we missed the Pro features way too much and would recommend most go for the Pro version. We also highly prefer nik Sharpener Pro to the time consuming guessing on the parameter settings in the Unsharp Mask filter. Sometimes when resizing to a very small image the difference is lost, however in our photo galleries at 480 by 360 we could see a clear difference. We also did feel that the colors were maintained better with nik Sharpener. In the samples above the red above the "DIS" appears more saturated, the yellow flowers seemed to have more color and detail, and the clock has better contrast etc...... In print tests of Nikon 990 shots nik Sharpener clearly does sharpen very noticeable the image when compared to no sharpening and the sharpen filters are off on the printer. The difference was not too dramatic when we used the sharpen setting in our Epson 1200 printer driver. However, the effect of nik Sharpener Pro is most appreciated when working with newer files from cameras like the Canon G1 and D30 where they appear to have intentionally used little in camera sharpening or left the data RAW. Canon D30 pictures just snap to life with nik Sharpener and the resulting prints are just fantastic as are pictures for the Internet at 72 dpi. Thus, nik Sharpener may not be needed by everyone, especially those with a smaller CCD camera where the firmware does adequate sharpening already. However, nik Sharpener works best on those files left mostly unaltered, and then it does work like a charm. Depending on the camera you have and the volume of work you do, nik Sharpener Pro is clearly a very useful product for many who need consistent results, color protection, batch processing and other Pro features. We think it is a must for cameras like the D30 as it helps make those images really shine, while saving time trying to get the parameters right in Unsharp Mask filter. With new pricing at $199 for the nik Sharpener Pro Internet and Ink Jet filters we feel you cannot go wrong with nik Sharpener Pro, especially for Pro users or if your camera is producing "soft" images and you need to print or resize a lot of pictures.

 

RETURN